11 Mar 24

Rev Gav

Spanner

Luke 1:34-35. Why would Luke include the bit about the virgin birth, potentially throwing a spanner in the works?

Luke 1:34-35

34 Mary asked the angel, “But how can this happen? I am a virgin.”

35 The angel replied, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the baby to be born will be holy, and he will be called the Son of God.

Reflect

An angel had appeared to Mary and just rolled off a long list of how amazing Mary’s child was going to be — how Jesus was going to be the divine king of the universe — and Mary, like Zechariah before her, points out the flaw in the angel’s plan. She was a virgin, and everyone knew you could not have children without having sexual intercourse, however, the angel had a surprise for her. Mary was going to fall pregnant without having sex with anyone.

This is hard to believe, right? And do not make the mistake of thinking that us twenty-first Century ‘modern’ people are much more rational than those living two thousand years ago. It was just as difficult to believe then as it is now. Mary was going to be filled with the Holy Spirit, and through the power of God, she was going to become pregnant.

This tiny part of the whole story raises all sorts of questions. Firstly, who did Jesus look like? I mean, if he was not Joseph’s natural son then who did he look like? And talking of Joseph, if Jesus was Joseph’s adopted son, then how could Jesus really be of the royal line of Joseph’s ancestor David? This passage really is a spanner in the works isn’t it?

But the question I want to ask is this: wouldn’t it have been better for the cause if Luke had edited out this contentious and hard-to-swallow bit of the story? Why bother leaving it in?

Mary encountered an angel and was soon to encounter the Holy Spirit. Why is this any harder to believe than, for example, the millions of Christians who claim that they have encountered God through Jesus Christ today? To deny this encounter, for Christians like me, would be to leave out an important part of the story of our own spiritual journey.

Do

Today, why not ask God to reveal himself afresh to you, that, like Mary, you too might encounter the Holy Spirit.

Pray

Holy God
Help me encounter you through Jesus Christ
and fill me with your Holy Spirit.
Reveal yourself afresh to me,
that I might know you and love you more deeply.
This day and forever.
Amen.

Think

Why do you think Luke included the potentially contentious part about Mary becoming pregnant through the Spirit of God?

C.S.I. Nov 18 16:55pm

I do think that maybe there was a practical reason, that being to dispel rumors of Jesus being the son of a Roman soldier or the like, rumors that are still abundant today. Of course, who his father was really isn't as important as what his message was. Though being God IS rather a plus in regard to validating his message. 😉 IDK, I'm just glad that the story is there! 🙂

Rev Gav Nov 19 11:17am

C.S.I. wrote:

I do think that maybe there was a practical reason, that being to dispel rumors of Jesus being the son of a Roman soldier or the like, rumors that are still abundant today. Of course, who his father was really…

I agree. Mebbe any talk of the human 'fatherhood' would be a distraction from the central message and purpose of Jesus?

You need to be a logged in Guest or Member to like this post.
© fab.church
Enable Notifications OK No Thanks